Facebooking and YouTube UploadingĪ major improvement with this version of the program: You can now upload videos to Facebook or YouTube from within the Premiere Elements 10 editing application. You can create this effect–with more control–in older Premiere Elements versions, using the excellent keyframing tools, but it’s a common thing that people want to do, and the new tool makes the process easy, with good results. You import an image (or multiple images, though you can use the tool on only one image at a time), and then you simply add boxes defining your focus areas and arrange them around the image. The new Pan and Zoom utility helps you create mini-movies composed of still shots. These functions could be very useful, especially for large catalogs of images and the new videos-from-stills tool (more on that below), but again, the dubious stability of the auto analyzer makes me reluctant to invest the time necessary to have the features analyze my content. New features in the organizer that do rely on the auto analyzer include the ability to search for stills that contain visually similar objects, and to search for duplicate content. However, this time around the updates benefit only still images. Photoshop Elements (if you have that application). The organizer is designed to make it easy to find both video and still content that you choose to index, and it acts as a shared resource between Premiere Elements and On top of that, the auto analyzer crashed often on my system. The organizer operates slowly, and it becomes even pokier if you turn on its auto-analyzer function, which scans still images (not video) for things such as the quality of shots and recognition of faces. Unfortunately, wrestling with the organizer application that comes with Premiere Elements 10 is a big deal. I encountered no crashes, no hesitations the application felt rock-solid. My impression was that Premiere Elements was utilizing all of the resources that it could, rather than operating inefficiently. When I had the software render a high-definition video project, all eight cores of my dual-Xeon workstation stayed at 100 percent for most of the operation, and it sucked up nearly 1GB of system memory. I can’t verify that claim, but the application rendered video pretty quickly, in part because it utilizes CPU cores effectively. Even so, Adobe claims that it has improved the program’s output performance by 75 percent. Premiere Pro CS5.5, mainly because Premiere Elements 10 is a relatively inexpensive consumer application, and the Mercury Playback Engine relies on pricey graphics cards that cost five times what Elements does, at minimum. Premiere Elements 10 does not have the full-blown Mercury Playback Engine from The main benefit of going to a 64-bit version, of course, is that the application can address more system memory, and thus should perform better (especially with high-definition content and larger projects) furthermore, it should be more stable because the app will be less likely to run out of memory, assuming that your PC is well stocked. The organizer that accompanies Elements remains 32-bit, too. Owners of Windows XP 64-bit systems or Windows Vista 64-bit systems will have to be satisfied with the 32-bit version. 64-Bit Version–But No VistaĪdobe now offers a 64-bit version of Premiere Elements 10, but only for Windows 7. I looked at the shipping version ($100, $80 upgrade as of September 20, 2011) of this consumer-oriented application, and found a few other new features that make me like it even more. Adobe’s Premiere Elements 10 video-editing application sports a few hand-me-downs from its pricier Premiere sibling, plus a major under-the-hood upgrade with the addition of a new Windows 7 64-bit version.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |